三立教育www.sljy.com
本次考试作文A Carbon Tax Beats a Vacuum Ban来自美国新闻网opinion版块2014年1月23日发表的一篇文章。作者认为通过对碳排放收税是比禁止一些类型的真空吸尘器的使用更好的策略。文章多讨论的话题属于环保主题，环保话题这样的世界性热门话题是最容易被选择作为分析文章来考察的。 写作例文：
To the extent that Sita Slavov presented a strong and convincing argument claiming that the practice of carbon tax charge is a better policy compared with a pure Vacuum Ban, the author has managed to achieve so by using both psychological as well as semi scholarly sources to support her argument, and by listing a number of real-life examples to gain an echo from her audiences in an empirical way.These strategies suggest that Sita Slavov structured her persuasion by adopting both pure-rational and emotional means. Starting from analyzing the big picture, the methodology and structure that Slavov adopted to construct her think piece is fairly creative. To review her article from a macro prospective, the author did not start to pose out her own argument until the last two paragraphs. As a matter of fact, Slavov used a significant length of lines to introduce her readers the background knowledge as well as relevant disputes around the issue at present. In doing so, Slavov
三立教育www.sljy.com
could not only offer her readers’ a comprehensive abstract of the issue’s core but could also do foreshadowing for her personal arguments as follow----since the present disputes make sense respectively while cannot pose out a reasonable evaluation of the ban policy, a third party train of thought is necessitated, hence Slavov used these introductory sections as a perfect guiding stone for her body partand conclusion. Moreover, such high percentile of introductory length would inspire her readers’ brown study on the issue’s essence by themselves rather than merely ponder over current disputes.
From a comparatively micro point of view, the author adopted both rhetorical as wellas academic strategies to frame her paragraphs.
Firstly, Sita Slavov took a quite prominent political prospective, mainly because she is trying to comment on the core and influence of an EU policy. Although thepolicy itself aims to improve human environment and is hence categorized as an environmental public policy, the author didn’t try to take an environmental stand of point and construct her piece into academic. Rather, she attempted to criticize the authority of the European Union’s bureaucratic legislation itself. In doing so, she has successfully managed to
三立教育www.sljy.com
interpret the core of the issue into “the government’s violation towards people’s freedom of choice inconsumptions” rather than “if the vacuum ban policy itself would be effective and
environmental friendly”. In doing so, Sita Slavov further took an anthropological prospective to convince her readers that the vacuum ban policy is deeply lack of legitimacy. Specifically, the author used two constant rhetorical questions to emphasize on the government’s “lack of legitimacy” and accuse the government of “taking intrusion into even the most minute of personal decisions”. By using such methodologies, Sita Slavov could successfully evoke her readers’ aversion towards the authority’s behavior and would hence turn to support his argument.
Moreover, to strengthen her demonstrations, the author quoted a comparatively largeamount of evidence. Specifically, in the second paragraph, Sita Slavov mainly referenced semi scholarly data and statistics to claim why the negative influence of EU’s public policy would be so profound. Meanwhile, in the third paragraph, Sita intended to use real life evidence to convey the message that such policy is absurd in practice. The style of language, by itself, has made Slavov’s think piece into a more easy to read format, and thus would successfully attract the her audiences’ interests of reading.
三立教育www.sljy.com
Though with her great success in persuasion, Slavov has also made a few errors interms of reasoning. For example, she didn’t manage to make intelligent and relevant criticisms of the authority’s public policy. Rather, he intended to delude her readers with petty and wild accusations against the government while didn’t provide his audiences enough scholarly evidences and sources to argue against the rationality and scientific necessity of the policy as well as its influence.
上海新托福精讲班多少钱？
一、整体情况
培训对象：英语基础薄弱大学生或未接触过托福考试的高中生
培训目的：通过对托福基础听说读写的巩固及强化训练，帮助学员提高托福基础和应试技巧，顺利通过考试。
目标分数：80-90分
课程时长：根据学员需要而定
课程学费：依照学员学习水平而定
二、课程安排
课程课程：主讲托福词汇、托福语法、托福听力、托福阅读、托福口语、托福写作；
辅导课程：梳理课程知识，解疑答惑，查漏补缺；
测评课程：托福全真模考及考试分析点评；
三、模考安排
第一次：课程中间，安排一次托福全真模拟考试及点评
三立教育www.sljy.com
第二次：课程结束，安排一次托福全真模拟考试及点评
备 注：除以上安排，学员结课后可根据自己的考试时间自行预约TPO小站模考
【看不懂？更多问题请留言咨询在线备考顾问】
相关推荐：
loading