polarity markings signify that when positive current enters both windings at the marked terminals, the MMFs of the two windings add.
Since the secondary voltage depends on the core flux φ0, it must be clear that the flux should not change appreciably if Es is to remain essentially constant under normal loading conditions. With the load connected, a current Is will flow in the secondary circuit, because the induced EMF Es will act as a voltage source. The secondary current produces an MMF NsIs that creates a flux. This flux that at anyinstant in time it opposes the main flux that created it in the first place. Of course, this is Lenz’s law in action. Thus the MMF represented by NsIs tends to reduce the core flux φ0. This means that the flux linking the primary winding reduces and consequently the primary induced voltage Ep, This reduction in induced voltage causes a greater difference between the impressed voltage and the counter induced EMF, therebyallowing more current to flow in the primary. The fact that primary current Ip increases means that the two conditions stated earlier are fulfilled: the power input increases to match the power output, and the primary MMF increases to offset the tendency of the secondary MMF to reduce the flux.
In general, it will be found that the transformer reacts almost instantaneously to keep the resultant core flux essentially constant. Moreover, the core flux φ0 drops very slightly between n o load and full load (about 1 to 3%), a necessary condition if Ep is to fall sufficiently to allow an increase in Ip.
On the primary side, Ip’ is the current that flows in the primary to balance the demagnetizing effect of Is. Its MMF NpIp’ sets up a flux linking the primary only. Since the core flux φ0 remains constant. I0 must be the same current that energizes the transformer at no load. The primary current Ip is therefore the sum of the current Ip’ and I0.
Because the no-load current is relatively small, it is correct to assume that the primary ampere-turns equal the secondary ampere-turns, since it is under this condition that the core flux is essentially constant. Thus we will assume that I0 is negligible, as itis only a small component of the full-load current.
When a current flows in the secondary winding, the resulting MMF (NsIs) creates a separate flux, apart from the flux φ0 produced by I0, which links the secondary winding only. This flux does no link with the primary winding and is therefore not a mutual flux.
In addition, the load current that flows through the primary winding creates a flux that links with the primary winding only; it is called the primary leakage flux. The secondary- leakage flux gives rise to an induced voltage that is not counter balanced by an equivalent induced voltage in the primary. Similarly, the voltage induced in the primary is not counterbalanced in the secondary winding. Consequently, these two induced voltages behave like voltage drops, generally called leakage reactance voltage drops. Furthermore, each winding taken into account, these additional voltage drops would complete the equivalent circuit diagram of a practical transformer. Note that the magnetizing
branch is shown in this circuit, which for our purposes will be disregarded. This follows our earlier assumption that the no-load current is assumed negligible in our calculations. This is further justified in that it is rarely necessary to predict transformer performance to such accuracies. Since the voltage drops are all directly proportional to the load current, it means that at no-load conditions there will be no voltage drops in either winding.
附录B
总电路图
相关推荐：
loading