K)(42)ͨ¹ýÒýÓÃÐÄÀíѧ¼ÒºÍÈÏÖª¿ÆÑ§¼ÒµÄ³É¹û£¬À³Ë¹ÀûÅúÆÀÁ˹«ÈϵĹ۵㣬¼´Ñ§Òµ³É¹¦ÊÇÖÇÁ¦ºÍŬÁ¦Ïà½áºÏµÄ½á¹û¡£ËûÈÏΪ£¬ºÃÆæÐÄÊǵÚÈý¸ö¹Ø¼üÒòËØ¡ª¡ªÒ²ÊÇÒ»¸öºÜÄѱ£³ÖµÄÒòËØ¡£Èç¹û²»¼ÓÒÔÅàÑø£¬ÈËÃǺÜÄѱ£³ÖºÃÆæ£º¡°¶ùͯʱÆÚµÄºÃÆæÐÄÊǶùͯºÍ³ÉÈ˺Ï×÷»ñµÃµÄ¡£Ò»¶¨ÄÜɱËÀºÃÆæÐĵķ½·¨¾ÍÊÇ·ÅÈÎ×ÔÁ÷¡£¡±
L)À³Ë¹Àû¾¯¸æËµ£¬Ñ§Ð£½ÌÓýͨ³£Ê¹º¢×ÓÃDZäµÃûÓÐºÃÆæÐÄ¡£¸¸Ä¸ÊÇÊܹý½ÌÓýºÍÖÐÉϽײãÕߣ¬Æäº¢×ÓÔ¶±È¹¤È˽ײãºÍϲã¼ÒÍ¥µÄº¢×ÓÃǸüºÃÆæ£¬ÉõÖÁÔÚºÜСµÄʱºò¾ÍÓÐÕâÑùµÄ²î¾à¡£(41)ȱ·¦ºÃÆæÐĵ¼ÖÂ֪ʶµÄÏà¶Ôȱ·¦£¬ÖªÊ¶µÄȱ·¦ÔÚºóÆÚËäÈ»²¢·Ç²»¿ÉÄÜÃÖ²¹£¬µ«ÊǺÜÄÑÃÖ²¹¡£
M)ËäÈ»À³Ë¹ÀûµÄÊéÓëÕþÖÎÎ޹أ¬µ«ÊÇËûҲûÓÐÍêÈ«»Ø±ÜÕâ¸öÎÊÌâ¡£(39)ÕþÖÎÁìµ¼ÈË£¬Í¬ÆäËû×éÖ¯µÄÁìµ¼ÈËÒ»Ñù£¬Ò²Ó¦¸Ã¾ßÓÐºÃÆæÐÄ¡£Ôڹؼüʱ¿ÌËûÃÇÓ¦¸ÃÌá³öÎÊÌâ¡£Ëû¾¯¸æËµ£¬²»ÏëÖªµÀ»á´øÀ´ÑÏÖØµÄºó¹û¡£
N)Ëû¾ÙÁËÒ»¸öÀý×Ó£¬ÇÇÖΡ¤ÎÖ¿Ë¡¤²¼Ê²Õþ¸®µÄʧ°Ü¾ÍÔÚÓÚûÓÐΪÈëÇÖÒÁÀ¿ËµÄºó¹û×öºÃ×¼±¸¡£À³Ë¹ÀûÈÏΪ£¬Ç°¹ú·À²¿³¤ÌÆÄɵ¡¤Àķ˹·Æ¶ûµÂÔÚ2002Äê˵£¬ÎÒÃÇÒª¾¯ÌèÄÇЩ¡°Î´ÖªµÄδ֪¡±£¬ÄÇЩÒò´Ë¶ø³°Ð¦ËûµÄÈËÊÇ´íÎóµÄ¡£À³Ë¹ÀûдµÀ£¬Àķ˹·Æ¶ûµÂµÄ¹Ûµã¡°²¢·Ç»ÄÃý¡ª¡ª¶øÊÇ´ÏÃ÷µÄ¡±¡£Ëû²¹³äµÀ£¬¡°±¯¾çÔÚÓÚËûûÓÐÌý´Ó×Ô¼ºµÄ½¨Òé¡£¡±
O)ÒÔÉÏÕâЩÈÃÎÒÃÇ»ØÏëÆð¹ÅµÂ¶û¡¢¿ËÀï˹µÙºÍ°à¼ÓÎ÷µÄÀý×Ó¡£Ã¿¸öÀý×ÓÖеÄÅúÆÀÕß¶¼ÔÚÒÔ²»Í¬µÄ·½Ê½Ö¸Ôðij¸öȨÍþÈËÊ¿¹ÊÒⲻȥ̽¾¿¡£ÎÒÏëÈöÁÕ߸ù¾Ý×Ô¼ºµÄÕþÖÎϲºÃÀ´¾ö¶¨ÄÄЩָÔð(Èç¹ûÓеϰ)ÊÇ¿ÉÒÔ³ÉÁ¢µÄ¡£µ«ÊÇÎÒÃÇÒª¾¯Ì裬²»Òª¶Ô´ýÁíÒ»·½µÄȱµãʱ¼á¾öÒªÇó¾ß±¸ºÃÆæÐÄ£¬¶ø¶ÔÎÒÃÇ×ÔÉíµÄȱµãÈ´¹ÌÖ´µØ²»¼Ó̽¾¿¡£(38)ÎÒÃÇÓ¦¸ÃÀÖÓÚΪÁË֪ʶ±¾Éí¶øÈ¥×·Çó֪ʶ¡ª¡ªÉõÖÁÊǵ±ÎÒÃÇËù·¢ÏÖµÄÊÇÎÒÃDz»Ì«ÏëÖªµÀµÄÊÂÇéµÄʱºò¡£ Ïê½âÏêÎö
36. To be curious£¬we need to realize first of all that there are many things we don¡¯t know. ÒëÎÄ ÎªÁ˱£³ÖºÃÆæ£¬ÎÒÃÇÊ×ÏÈÐèÒªÈÏ Ê¶µ½ÓкܶàÎÒÃDz»ÖªµÀµÄÊÂÇé¡£ ¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖеÄto be curiousºÍ first¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£
H) Moreover, in order to be curious, ¡°you have to be aware of a gap in your knowledge in the first place.¡± Although Leslie perhaps paints a bit broadly in contending that most of us are unaware of how much we don¡¯t know, he¡¯s surely right to point out that the problem is growing; ¡°Google can give us the powerful illusion that all questions have definite answers.¡±
Ïê½âH)¶ÎµÚÒ»¾äÖ¸³ö£¬ÎªÁ˱äµÃºÃÆæ£¬¡°ÄãÊ×ÏÈÓ¦¸ÃÈÏʶµ½×ÔÉí֪ʶµÄǷȱ¡£¡±ÔÎÄÖеÄa gap in your knowledgeÖ¸µÄ¾ÍÊÇthings we don¡¯t know£»Ìâ¸ÉÖеÄfirst of allÓëÔÎÄÖеÄin the first placeÊÇͬÒå´Ê×飬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªH)¡£
37. According to Leslie, curiosity is essential to one¡¯s success. ÒëÎÄ À³Ë¹ÀûÈÏΪ£¬ºÃÆæÐĶÔÒ»¸öÈ˵ijɹ¦ÖÁ¹ØÖØÒª¡£ ¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖÐµÄ to one¡¯s success ¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£
D) The journalist Ian Leslie, in his new and enjoyable book Curious: The Desire to Know and Why Your Future Depends on It, insists that the answer to that last question is ¡®Yes¡¯. Leslie argues that curiosity is a much- overlooked human virtue, crucial to our success, and that we are losing it.
Ïê½â D)¶Î¿ªÊ¼½éÉÜÁËÒÁ¶÷¡¤À³Ë¹Àû¶ÔºÃÆæÐĵĹ۵㣬ËûÈÏΪºÃÆæÐı¾Éí¾Í¾ßÓÐÌØÊâµÄ¼ÛÖµ6±¾¶Î×îºóÒ»¾ä×ܽáÁËÀ³Ë¹ÀûµÄ¿´·¨£¬ËûÈÏΪºÃÆæÐÄÊÇÒ»¸ö±»¹ý¶ÈºöÊÓµÄÈËÀàÓŵ㣬¶ÔÎÒÃǵijɹ¦Ê®·ÖÖØÒª£¬µ«ÊÇÎÒÃÇÕýÔÚʧȥºÃÆæÐÄ¡£Ìâ¸ÉÖеÄessentialÓëÔÎÄÖеÄcrucialÊÇͬÒå´Ê£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªD)¡£
38. We should feel happy when we pursue knowledge for knowledge¡¯s sake. ÒëÎÄ µ±ÎÒÃÇΪÁË֪ʶ¶ø×·Çó ֪ʶµÄʱºòÓ¦¸Ã¸Ðµ½¸ßÐË¡£
¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖеÄpursue knowledge for knowledge¡¯s sake¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£
O) All of which brings us back to Goodell and the Christie case and Benghazi. Each critic in those examples is charging, in a different way, that someone in authority is intentionally being incurious. I leave it to the reader¡¯s political preference to decide which, if any, charges should stick. But let¡¯s be careful about demanding curiosity about the other side¡¯s weaknesses and remaining determinedly incurious about our own. We should be delighted to pursue knowledge for its own sake¡ª even when what we find out is something we didn¡¯t particularly want to know.
Ïê½â O)¶ÎÊǶÔÈ«ÎĵÄ×ܽᡣ×÷ÕßÔÚ´ËÌáÐѶÁÕߣ¬²»ÒªÒÔË«ÖØ±ê׼ȥÅж϶Է½ºÍ¼º·½µÄÓÅȱµã£¬¼´²»ÄÜÖ¸Ôð¶Ô·½È±·¦Ì½Ñ°ÕæÏàµÄºÃÆæÐÄ£¬¶ø¶Ô¼º·½ºÃÆæÐĵÄȱʧÊÓ¶ø²»¼û¡£×îºóÒ»¾äÖ¸³ö£¬ÎÒÃÇÓ¦¸ÃÀÖÓÚΪÁË֪ʶ±¾Éí¶øÈ¥×·Çó֪ʶ¡ª¡ªÉõÖÁÊǵ±ÎÒÃÇËù·¢ÏÖµÄÊÇÎÒÃDz»Ì«ÏëÖªµÀµÄÊÂÇéµÄʱºò¡£ÔÎÄpursue knowledge for its own sake.Öеģºits own¼´Ö¸µÄÊÇknowledge¡¯s£¬Ìâ¸ÉÖеÄhappy£ºÓëÔÎÄÖеÄdelightedÊÇͬÒå´Ê£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªO) ¡£
39. Political leaders£¬lack of curiosity will result in bad consequences. ÒëÎÄ ÕþÖÎÁìµ¼ÈËȱ·¦ºÃÆæÐĻᵼÖÂÑÏÖØµÄºó¹û¡£
¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖеÄPolitical leadersºÍconsequences¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£
M) Although Leslie¡¯s book isn¡¯t about politics, he doesn¡¯t entirely shy away from the problem. Political leaders£¬ like leaders of other organizations, should be curious. They should ask questions at crucial moments. There are serious consequences, he warns, in not wanting to know.
Ïê½â M)¶Î¶¨Î»¾äÌáµ½£¬ÕþÖÎÁìµ¼ÈËÒ²Ó¦¸Ã¾ßÓÐºÃÆæÐÄ£¬²»ÏëÖªµÀ»á´øÀ´ÑÏÖØµÄºó¹û¡£ÔÎÄÖеÄnot wanting to knowÖ¸µÄ¾ÍÊDz»¾ßÓÐºÃÆæÐÄ£¬¼´Ìâ¸ÉÖеÄlack of curiosity£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªM)¡£
40. There are often accusations about politicians£¬and the media¡¯s lack of curiosity to find out the truth.
ÒëÎÄ ¾³£ÓÐÈËÖ¸ÔðÕþ¿ÍºÍýÌåȱ·¦Ñ°ÕÒÕæÏàµÄºÃÆæÐÄ¡£
¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖеÄaccusations¡¢media ºÍ find out the truth ¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£
B) The accusation of incuriosity is one that we hear often, carrying the suggestion that there is something wrong with not wanting to search out the truth. ¡°I have been bothered for a long time about the curious lack of curiosity,¡± said a Democratic member of the New Jersey legislature back in July, referring to an insufficiently inquiring attitude on the part of an assistant to New Jersey Governor Chris Christie who chose not to ask hard questions about the George Washington Bridge traffic scandal. ¡°Isn¡¯t the mainstream media the least bit curious about what happened?¡± wrote conservative writer Jennifer Rubin earlier this year, referring to the attack on Americans in Benghazi, Libya.
Ïê½â ÎÄÕÂǰÁ½¶Î¾ÙÀý˵Ã÷ÏÖÔÚÈËÃDZäµÃÔ½À´Ô½²»ºÃÆæ¡£b)¶Î³Ð½ÓÉÏÎÄ£¬¼ÌÐø¾ÙÀý£¬Ò»¸öÊǶÔÐÂÔóÎ÷ÖÝÖݳ¤¿ËÀï˹¡¤¿ËÀï˹µÙÖúÀíµÄÖ¸Ôð£¬ÁíÒ»¸öÊǶÔÖ÷Á÷ýÌåµÄÖ¸Ôð£¬Á½¸öÀý×ÓÖж¼ÊÇÖ¸ÔðËûÃDz»È¥Ì½Ñ°ÕæÏ࣬Òò´ËÌâ¸ÉÊǶԸöεĸÅÀ¨×ܽᣬ¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªB)¡£
41. The less curious a child is, the less knowledge the child may turn out to have. ÒëÎÄ Ò»¸öº¢×ÓÔ½²»ºÃÆæ£¬½á¹ûËûѧ ֪ʶ¾ÍÔ½ÉÙ¡£
¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖÐµÄ less curious ºÍ less knowledge¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£
L) School education, he warns, is often conducted in a way that makes children incurious. Children of educated and upper-middle-class parents turn out to be far more curious, even at early ages, than children of working class and lower class families. That lack of curiosity produces a relative lack of knowledge, and the lack of knowledge is difficult if not impossible to compensate for later on.
Ïê½â L)¶ÎÖ¸³öÁËºÃÆæÐĺͽÌÓýÖ®¼äµÄÏ໥¹ØÏµ¡£±¾¶ÎµÚÒ»¾äÊÇÀ³Ë¹Àû¶ÔѧУ½ÌÓýµÄ¿´
·¨£¬ËûÈÏΪѧУ½ÌÓýÈÝÒ×Èú¢×ÓÃÇʧȥºÃÆæÐÄ¡£µÚ¶þ¾ä½Ó×ÅÖ¸³öÊܹý½ÌÓýµÄ¸¸Ä¸µÄº¢×ÓºÍÖÐÉϽײã¼ÒÍ¥µÄº¢×ÓÔ¶±È¹¤È˽ײãºÍϲã¼ÒÍ¥µÄº¢×Ó¸üºÃÆæ¡£µÚÈý¾äÈÔÊÇÀ³Ë¹ÀûµÄ¹Ûµã£¬ËûÈÏΪȱ·¦ºÃÆæÐĻᵼÖÂ֪ʶµÄÏà¶Ôȱ·¦£¬¶øÖªÊ¶µÄȱ·¦ÈÕºóÊǺÜÄÑÃÖ²¹µÄ¡£Ìâ¸ÉÊǶԶ¨Î»¾äµÄͬÒåתÊö£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªL)¡£
42. It is widely accepted that academic accomplishment lies in both intelligence and diligence.
ÒëÎÄ ÈËÃÇÆÕ±é³ÐÈÏ£¬È¡µÃѧҵ³É¾ÍÐèÒªÖÇÁ¦ºÍÇÚ·Ü¡£
¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖеÄacademicºÍ intelligence¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£
K) Citing the work of psychologists and cognitive (ÈÏÖªµÄ) scientists, Leslie criticizes the received wisdom that academic success is the result of a combination of intellectual talent and hard work. Curiosity, he argues, is the third key factor¡ªand a difficult one to preserve. If not cultivated, it will not survive: ¡°Childhood curiosity is a collaboration between child and adult. The surest way to kill it is to leave it alone.¡±
Ïê½â K)¶ÎÖ÷ÒªÌÖÂÛÁËºÃÆæÐÄÔÚѧҵ·½ÃæµÄ×÷ÓᣵÚÒ»¾äÖ¸³ö£¬´ó¼ÒÆÕ±éÈÏΪѧҵ³É¹¦ÊÇÖÇÁ¦Ì츳ºÍÇÚ·ÜŬÁ¦Ïà½áºÏµÄ²úÎ¶øÀ³Ë¹ÀûÅúÆÀÁËÕâÒ»¹Ûµã¡£ÔÎÄÖÐthe received wisdomÒâΪ¡°¹«ÈϵĹ۵㡱£¬Ìâ¸ÉÖеÄwidely acceptedÊǶÔËüµÄͬÒåתÊö£»Ìâ¸ÉÖеÄintelligence¶ÔÓ¦ÔÎÄÖеÄintellectual talent; diligence¶ÔÓ¦hard work£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªK)¡£
43. Visiting a bookshop as curiosity leads us can be a good way to entertain ourselves. ÒëÎÄ ËæºÃÆæÐĵÄÖ¸ÒýÔÚÊéµêÖзÔÄÊÇ Ò»¸öºÜºÃµÄÓéÀÖ·½Ê½¡£
¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖеÄbookshop¡¢as curiosity leads us ºÍ entertain ¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£ J) Somewhat nostalgically (»³¾ÉµØ), he quotes John Maynard Keynes¡¯s justly famous words of praise to the bookstore: ¡°One should enter it vaguely, almost in a dream, and allow what is there freely to attract and influence the eye. To walk the rounds of the bookshops, dipping in as curiosity dictates, should be an afternoon¡¯s entertainment.¡± If only!
Ïê½â J)¶ÎÖ÷ÒªÊÇÒýÓÃÁËÔ¼º²¡¤Ã·Äɵ¡¤¿¶÷˹¶ÔÊéµêµÄ°ýÑïÖ®´Ê£¬¼´ÈËÃÇÓ¦¸ÃÃÔÃÔºýºýµØ×ß½øÊéµê£¬ÈÎÆ¾ÊéµêÀïµÄÊéÎüÒý×Ô¼º¡£¶øÇÒÔÚÊéµêÀïÐŲ½ÂþÓΡ¢ËæºÃÆæÐĶøä¯ÀÀÊé¼®¿ÉÒÔ³ÉΪһ¸öÏÂÎçµÄÏûDz¡£Ìâ¸ÉÖеÄVisiting a bookshop ¶ÔÓ¦ÔÎÄÖÐµÄ To walk the rounds of the bookshops; as curiosity leads us ÊǶÔÔÎÄÖÐ as curiosity dictatesµÄͬÒåתÊö£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªJ)¡£
44. Both the rise of the Internet and reduced appetite for literary fiction contribute to people¡¯s declining curiosity.
ÒëÎÄ ÒòÌØÍøµÄÐËÆðÒÔ¼°ÈËÃǶÔÎÄѧС˵ÔĶÁÐËȤµÄϽµÏ÷ÈõÁËÈËÃÇµÄºÃÆæÐÄ¡£ ¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖеÄthe rise of the InternetºÍliterary fiction¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£
G) Leslie presents considerable evidence for the proposition that the society as a whole is growing less curious. In the U. S. and Europe, for example, the rise of the Internet has led to a declining consumption of news from outside the reader¡¯s borders. But not everything is to be blamed on technology. The decline in interest in literary fiction is also one of the causes identified by Leslie. Reading literary fiction, he says, makes us more curious.
Ïê½â G)¶Î×ܽáÁËÀ³Ë¹ÀûÑÛÖе¼ÖÂÈËÃÇºÃÆæÐÄȱʧµÄÔÒò¡£µÚ¶þ¾äÊÇÒ»¸öÀýÖ¤£¬ÓÉÓÚÒòÌØÍøµÄÐËÆð£¬ÃÀ¹úºÍÅ·Ö޵ĶÁÕß¶Ô×Ô¼º¹ú¼ÒÖ®ÍâµÄÐÂÎŵĹØ×¢¶ÈϽµ¡£µ«ÊÇ£¬¼¼Êõ²¢·ÇËùÓеÄ×ï¿ý»öÊ×£¬µÚËľä½Ó×ÅÌáµ½ÁËÁíÍâÒ»¸öÔÒò£¬¼´ÈËÃǶÔÎÄѧС˵µÄÐËȤϽµ¡£Ìâ¸ÉÊǶԱ¾¶ÎµÄ¸ÅÀ¨×ܽᣬÌâ¸ÉÖеÄreduced appetite¶ÔÓ¦ÔÎÄÖеÄdecline in interest£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªG)¡£
45. Mankind wouldn¡¯t be so innovative without curiosity. ÒëÎÄ Ã»ÓÐºÃÆæÐÄ£¬ÈËÀà¾Í²»»áÈç´ËÓд´Ð¾«Éñ¡£
¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖеÄinnovativeºÍ without curiosity¶¨Î»ÖÁÔÎÄ»Ïß´¦¡£
F) Why is this a problem? Because without curiosity we will lose the spirit of innovation and entrepreneurship. We will see unimaginative governments and dying corporations make disastrous decisions. We will lose a vital part of what has made humanity as a whole so successful as a species.
Ïê½â F)¶ÎÊ×¾äÌá³öÁËÒ»¸öÎÊÌ⣬¼´È±·¦ºÃÆæÐÄΪʲô»á³ÉΪһ¸öÎÊÌâ¡£µÚ¶þ¾äÌṩÁ˴𰸣ºÒòΪûÓÐºÃÆæÐÄ£¬ÎÒÃǾͻáʧȥ´´Ð¾«ÉñºÍÆóÒµ¼Ò¾«Éñ¡£Ìâ¸ÉÊǶԶ¨Î»¾äµÄͬÒåתÊö£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªF)¡£ Section C
Passage One
È«ÎÊ·Òë
(46)Ë¥ÀÏ·¢ÉúÔÚÎÒÃÇËùÓÐÈËÉíÉÏ£¬Í¨³£±»ÈÏΪÊÇÉúÃüµÄ×ÔÈ»×é³É²¿·Ö?½«Ë¥ÀϳÆ×÷¡°¼²²¡¡±ËƺõºÜÓÞ´À¡£
(47)ÁíÒ»·½Ãæ.¿ÆÑ§¼ÒÔ½À´Ô½ÈÏʶµ½Ë¥ÀϺÍÉúÎïѧÄêÁäÊÇÁ½ÂëÊ£¬Ç°ÕßÊÇÖîÈçÐÄÔಡ¡¢°©Ö¢µÈ¶àÖÖ¼²²¡µÄÖ÷Òª·çÏÕÒòËØ¡£ÕâÑù¿´À´£¬Ë¥Àϱ¾Éí»òÐí¿ÉÒÔ¿´×÷ÊÇÄÜÖÎÁƵ쬾ÍÏñÖÎÁƸßѪѹ»òάÉúËØÈ±·¦Ò»Ñù¡£
(48)ÉúÎïÎïÀíѧ¼ÒÑÇÀú¿Ë˹¡¤ÔúÎÖÂå¿Æ·òÈÏΪ˥ÀÏÓ¦¸Ã±»ÊÓΪһÖÖ¼²²¡¡£Ëû˵½«Ë¥ÀÏÃèÊöΪһÖÖ¼²²¡»á´ÙʹÈËÃÇÑз¢ÖÎÁÆ·½·¨¡£
¡°ËüÎªÖÆÒ©ÐÐÒµËɰó£¬Ê¹ËûÃÇÄܹ»¿ªÊ¼ÖÎÁÆË¥ÀÏÕâÖÖ¼²²¡£¬¶ø²»½ö½öÊÇÖÎÁÆÆäÖÖÖÖ¸±×÷Ó㬡±Ëû˵¡£
¡°ÏÖÔÚ£¬ÈËÃÇÈÏΪ˥ÀÏÊÇ×ÔÈ»¶øÇÒÎÞ·¨¿ØÖƵÄÊÂÇ顱£¬Ëû˵¡£¡°ÔÚѧÊõ½ç£¬ÈËÃǰÑË¥ÀÏÑо¿×÷Ϊһ¸öÐËȤÁìÓò£¬ÔÚÆäÖг¢ÊÔ¿ª·¢¸ÉÔ¤´ëÊ©¡£(49)ҽѧ½çÒ²ÈÏΪ˥ÀÏÊÇÀíËùµ±È»µÄ£¬³ýÁËÈÃÈËÃDZ£³ÖÔÚÒ»¶¨µÄ½¡¿µ·¶Î§ÄÚÖ®Í⣬ËûÃǶԴËÎÞÄÜΪÁ¦¡£¡±
µ«Èç¹û°ÑË¥ÀÏ¿´×÷ÊÇÒ»ÖÖ¼²²¡£¬Ëû˵£¬¡°Õâ»áÎüÒý×ʽ𣬲¢¸Ä±äÎÒÃǵÄÒ½ÁÆ·½Ê½¡£ÖØÒªµÄÊÇÈÏʶµ½Ë¥ÀÏÊÇ¿ÉÒÔÖÎÓúµÄ¡£¡±
¡°¹ýÈ¥ÈËÃÇÒ»Ö±¶¼ÖªµÀÉíÌå»áÀÛ»ýËðÉË£¬¡±Ëû²¹³äµÀ¡£¡°ÖÎÁÆË¥ÀϵÄΨһ·½·¨¾ÍÊÇÕÒµ½ÐÞ¸´ËðÉ˵ķ½·¨¡£ÎÒÈÏΪËüÊÇÓëË¥ÀÏÏà¹ØµÄ¼²²¡µÄÔ¤·ÀÒ©Îï¡£¡±
(50)¾É½ðɽ¼ÓÀû¸£ÄáÑÇ´óѧµÄÂ×ÄɵÂ?º£¸¥Àï¿Ë½ÌÊÚ˵£¬Ë¥ÀÏ¿ÉÒÔ±»ÖÎÓúÕâÒ»Ïë·¨Òâζ×ÅÈËÀàµÄÊÙÃü¿ÉÒÔÑÓ³¤£¬Ò»Ð©Ñо¿ÈËÔ±ÈÏΪÕâÊÇ¿ÉÄܵġ£µ«º£¸¥Àï¿Ë²¢²»ÕâôÈÏΪ¡£
¡°ÓÐÐí¶àÈË´Ó°©Ö¢¡¢Öзç»òÐÄÔಡÖеÃÒÔ¿µ¸´¡£µ«ËûÃǼÌÐøË¥ÀÏ£¬ÒòΪ˥ÀÏÓë¼²²¡ÊÇ·Ö¿ªµÄ£¬¡±º£¸¥Àï¿Ë˵¡£¡°¼´Ê¹ÕâЩËÀÒò±»Ïû³ý£¬Ô¤ÆÚÊÙÃüÒ²²»»á´ó´ó³¬¹ý92Ëê¡£¡± Ïê½âÏêÎö
46. B)¡£¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖÐµÄ generally believe about aging ¶¨Î»µ½µÚÒ»¶ÎµÚÒ»¾ä£ºAging happens to all of us, and is generally thought of as a natural part of life.
Ïê½â ÍÆÀíÅжÏÌâ¡£ÎÄÕ¿ªÆªÖ¸³ö£¬Ë¥ÀÏ·¢ÉúÔÚÎÒÃÇËùÓÐÈËÉíÉÏ£¬Í¨³£±»ÈÏΪÊÇÉúÃüµÄ×ÔÈ»×é³É²¿·Ö¡£¼ÈÈ»ÊÇÉúÃüµÄ×ÔÈ»×é³É²¿·Ö£¬Ò²¾ÍÊÇ˵˥ÀÏÎÞ·¨¸Ä±ä£¬ÈËÃÇÎ޼ƿÉÊ©¡£ÓÉ´Ë¿ÉÍÆ¶Ï£¬ÈËÃÇͨ³£ÈÏΪËûÃǶÔË¥ÀÏÎÞÄÜΪÁ¦£¬¹Ê´ð°¸ÎªB)¡£
µã¾¦ A)¡°ËüÓ¦¸Ã²»»áÒýÆðË¿ºÁ¿Ö»Å¡±ÎÄÖÐûÓÐÌáµ½£¬¹ÊÅųý£»C)¡°ËüÓ¦¸Ã±»¿´×÷ÊÇÒ»ÖÖ¼²²¡¡±£¬Ê׶εڶþ¾äÌáµ½£¬½«Ë¥ÀϳÆ×÷¡°¼²²¡¡±ËƺõºÜÓÞ´À£¬¿É¼ûÈËÃÇͨ³£²»°ÑË¥ÀÏ¿´×÷¼²²¡£¬¹ÊÅųý£»D)¡°ËûÃÇ¿ÉÒÔ½èÖú¿ÆÑ§µÄ½ø²½ÑÓ³ÙËü¡±²¢·ÇÈËÃÇͨ³£µÄ¿´·¨£¬¹ÊÅųý¡£
47.A)¡£¶¨Î» ÓÉÌâ¸ÉÖеÄscientists ¶¨Î»µ½µÚ¶þ¶Î£ºOn the other hand, scientists are increasingly learning that aging and biological age are two different things... aging itself might be seen as something treatable, the way you would treat high blood pressure or a vitamin deficiency.
Ïê½â ÊÂʵϸ½ÚÌâ¡£ÎÄÕµڶþ¶ÎÌáµ½£¬ÁíÒ»·½Ã棬¿ÆÑ§¼ÒÔ½À´Ô½ÈÏʶµ½Ë¥ÀϺÍÉúÎïѧÄêÁäÊÇÁ½ÂëÊ£¬Ç°ÕßÊÇÖîÈçÐÄÔಡ¡¢°©Ö¢µÈ¶àÖÖ¼²²¡µÄÖ÷Òª·çÏÕÒòËØ¡£ÕâÑù¿´À´£¬Ë¥Àϱ¾Éí»ò
Ïà¹ØÍÆ¼ö£º