少，那选民的想法实际落空。即他们的建议是蒙选民的。E错在消防部门指定为禁烟区的，建议并不是取消它，选民并不存在MISLEADING。
1。该问题的误解是宣传上的误解（circulated misleading）
2。在宣传时工人的做法是ask only：你支持全州禁烟吗。选民对这句口号的反应是：要全州全面禁烟啦。
至于原文的最后一句话是说明这些工人实际想禁烟的地方，并没有在宣传中讲。这本身就已造成一个circulated misleading。它实质上是为B作铺垫。选项B的circumstances和原文的最后一句话说明该计划的全州禁烟作用很小。而选民的期望肯定认为要全州全面禁烟，且有不小的作用。如果选民认为该计划的真相是指部分禁烟且在rual作用是很少的，会支持他们吗。在这点上作宣传的工人和选民的认识是不同的(误解误导：misleading)
注意问题的问法：voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide。它的误解
点在能否实际扩大到全国性禁烟上。而不在对于已经禁烟了的市镇会产生何效果。
选民的误解点在于禁烟是否实际对全州有效，其作用由于它规定的内容有些rural没有：全州的零售点和政府部门不许抽烟。而rural这些地方很少。所以该禁烟法律实际上对这些地方并没作用。而C确实禁烟实际上和规定上对所有地方都起作用，尽管已近有地方法令的松啦，但仍实际对各地方起作用，法律并没有架空，从这点上宣传所说的和实际的并没有差别，不能说宣传误导，他们并没骗人。从这点上不能说有误导，因为他们没骗人
21
Q40 GWD-24-37.（CD-10-37）
Fish currently costs about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs. Seafood stores buy fish from the same wholesalers and at the same prices, and other business expenses have also been about the same. But new tax breaks will substantially lower the cost of doing business within the city. Therefore, in the future, profit margins will be higher at seafood stores within the city than at suburban seafood stores.
For the purposes of evaluating the argument, it would be most useful to know whether
A. more fish wholesalers are located within the city than in the surrounding suburbs.
B. Any people who currently own seafood stores in the suburbs surrounding Eastville will relocate their businesses
nearer to the city C. The wholesale price of fish is likely to fall in the future
D. Fish has always cost about the same at seafood stores throughout Eastville and its surrounding suburbs. E. Seafood stores within the city will in the future set prices that are lower than those at suburban seafood stores.
22
GWD-TN-13 T-9-Q2 Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to
domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashew were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government?s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing plants and plastics B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in kernland to sell
processed nuts at competitive prices E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in kernland off their land and into the
cities
E的意思是如果农民种腰果没钱-->他们就会进城--->失业率就增加
现在政府要取消关税,那农民就有钱赚了,他们就安安心心在家种腰果,就不进城了,城里的失业率就不增加了.(至少农民不会跑到城里去增加城市的失业率了)--->weaken
原文：1。加税，利于加工业。2。不加税，利于农民（可以按世界市场价卖）。因为加工场都在城市，所以不加税，会使城市失业增加 注意，结论是说关于不加税的情况 C。 农民的失业率和结论无关，故错
D。低于世界市场价是加税的情况，结论是不加税的情况，无关。退一步讲，也是加强，结论说不加税不好，D说加税好，所以有加强的味道。
E。现在的情况是大量农民进城抢城市人口的饭碗，如果不加税，则有利于农民，使农民回流，则可减少城市就业压力，所一WEAKEN结论。
lift tariff当然是去掉税啦，就像lift ban(restriction)，Lift的意思为to remove a rule or a law that says that something is not allowed。而且从原文理解，加税对加工厂有利，作为对比，对农民有利的当然就是不加啦，要不为何要考虑加不加税的问题，干脆都加拉，因为对加工产和农民都好
T-9-Q3 Business Consultant: some corporations shun the use of executive titles because they fear that the use of titles indicating position in the corporation tends to inhibit communication up and down the corporate hierarchy. Since an
executive who uses a title is treated with more respect by outsiders, however, use of a title can facilitate an executive’s dealings with external businesses. The obvious compromise is for these executives to use their corporate titles
externally but not internally, since even if it is widely known that the corporation‘s executives use executive titles outside their organization, this knowledge does not by itself inhibit communication within the corporation. In the consultant‘s reasoning, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A. The first presents an obstacle to achieving a certain goal; the second presents a reason for considering that goal to
be undesirable.
23
B. The first is a consideration that has led to the adoption of a certain strategy; the second presents a reason against
adopting that strategy. C. The first describes a concern that the consultant dismisses as insignificant; the second is a consideration that serves
as the basis for that dismissal. D. The first is a belief for which the consultant offers support; the second is part of that support.
E. The first is a belief against which evidence is offered; the second is part of the evidence offered against that belief.
T-9-Q4 In the years following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes. The argument above requires which of the following assumptions?
A. During the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes did not increase by as much as it
had during the year prior to the tax increase. B. The one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increases was due to a smaller tax increase. C. The pretax price of a pack of cigarettes gradually decreased throughout the year before and the year after the tax
increase. D. For the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes was not eight or more cents lower
than it had been the previous year. E. As the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes rises, the pretax price also rises.
天哪这题真饶！
我的理解：论题是税费增加第二年香烟销量减少10%和税后价格增加有关，题目给出信息是税费每合增加8分，但税前裸价变化没有信息，而税后价和这2者都有关系。于是D中给出了补充信息：第二年税前裸价并不比前年低8美分或以上，也就是说税前裸价没有下降到足以抵消税费增加的幅度，可能是降了5美分，甚至也可能是裸价提高了。这样得出的结论是第二年每合税后总价格（裸价+税费）确实是增加了，从而引起香烟销量剧降。
A选项只提到第二年税前裸价的增加幅度还没有其前一年增加的多，但没有提其前一年的税费变化，所以无从判断比较这两年税后价格的变化。
注意读题，特别是文章的最后一句结论句。
―税后价格‖和销售量有很大关系，不是税收的数量。B只是说税收的数量和销售量有关，不能说明税后的价格。
A错在不清楚增税前一年的税后价格的变化情况，若是很大的话则正好削弱了结论，若是增加很少（跟8分没有可比性）的话就支持了结论。
D说明增税后，税前价格的减少不会高于8分，也就是税后价格会高于原来的价格，然后导致销售减少，因此支持了结论。
数学算式比较清晰：
税后价 = 税前价 + 税
提税前税后价P1 = A1 + B （A1 为税前价，B 为税）
提税后税后价P2 = A2 + （B + 8 分钱）（A2 为税前价，（B + 8） 为提高后的税） 两式相减：P2 – P1 > 0,
则：A2 > A1 - 8，即提税后，税前价不会比原来的税前价低8分以上，
说明增税后，税前价格的减少不会高于8分，也就是税后价格会高于原来的价格，然后导致销售减少，因此支持了结论。
24
相关推荐：
loading