第一范文网 - 专业文章范例文档资料分享平台

Towards Networked Learning Analytics – A concept and a tool(7)

来源:用户分享 时间:2021-06-02 本文由缱绻成歌 分享 下载这篇文档 手机版
说明:文章内容仅供预览,部分内容可能不全,需要完整文档或者需要复制内容,请下载word后使用。下载word有问题请添加微信号:xxxxxx或QQ:xxxxxx 处理(尽可能给您提供完整文档),感谢您的支持与谅解。

Clustering user visits Groups of user visits Patterns of common navigational

behaviour reflecting users actions

and motivations

Association rule mining Associations among web

document references Patterns of common usage reflecting related web documents, as well as the notion of antecedents and consequents

Sequential pattern mining Associations among sequences

of web document references

over time Patterns of typical browsing behaviours over time

Table 1. Interpretation of Web usage mining techniques [Source: Koutri et al., 2004]

Up to our knowledge none of these systems has been used for analysing learners’ interaction within a networked learning environment. This does not mean that there are not any attempts for qualitative evaluation measurements based on log files. On the contrary, interaction analysis using quantitative approaches is still an open R&D topic in the area of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL), despite the various attempts already made. A lot of resources about Interaction analysis in CSCL can be found in the web site of the Kaleidoscope project ().

Moore (1989) suggested three kinds of interactions in a networked learning environment. These are: learner–content interactions, learner–instructor interactions, and learner–learner interactions. These three together have been used for trying to understand how learners construct knowledge in online networked learning environments. Several research groups developed coding schemes that categorize interactions according to models of knowledge construction in an effort to perform interaction analysis more efficiently. Gunawardena and colleagues (1997) developed a model and coding scheme for online interaction with five phases of knowledge construction:

i.sharing/comparing of information;

ii.discovery and exploration of dissonance or inconsistency among ideas, concepts, or statements;

iii.negotiation of meaning/co-construction of knowledge;

iv.testing and modification of proposed synthesis or co-construction; and

v.agreement statement(s)/applications of newly constructed meaning.

Shute and Glaser (1990) propose a technique that enables the evaluator to derive global learner differences on the basis of learner interaction measures. The approach by Shute and Glaser can be summarized as involving 1) counting frequencies of actions, 2) categorizing them into ‘meaningful’ units, and 3) making comparisons across groups.

Gaßner et al, (2003) illustrate how log files can be captured, codified and analysed for providing statistics of interaction as well as activity patterns. The MatchMaker TNG tool offers a framework for activity logging. As they claim “using the MatchMaker TNG log files we can access the complete structure of the activities that took place in a session”. An analysis method like the one that appears in Mühlenbrock (2004), can help evaluators in identifying collaborative activity patterns and reflecting them as feedback. Most of the times, interaction data concern the number of the messages read, the postings to a discussion board, the file up-loads, the annotations to the uploaded files, etc. Examination of the frequency of interactions across the individual learner or among members of groups can lead to identifying patterns of contributions.

Apart from quantitative measurements, analysis of participants' postings (content analysis) should be performed in sequel, so as to reveal many of the behaviors associated with collaborative learning situations (Curtis & Lawson, 2001).

Recently, CSCL research has focused on the use of Social Network Analysis (SNA) (Wortham, 1999), as an extension to the common technique of descriptive statistics of the messages or length of contributions (Benbunan-Fich & Hiltz, 1999).SNA creates graphical scheme of the contributions where factors such as “centrality” and “density” can be used for describing the learners’ groups cohesion. For example, “density” is a

Networked Learning 2006 4

搜索“diyifanwen.net”或“第一范文网”即可找到本站免费阅读全部范文。收藏本站方便下次阅读,第一范文网,提供最新人文社科Towards Networked Learning Analytics – A concept and a tool(7)全文阅读和word下载服务。

Towards Networked Learning Analytics – A concept and a tool(7).doc 将本文的Word文档下载到电脑,方便复制、编辑、收藏和打印
本文链接:https://www.diyifanwen.net/wenku/1194543.html(转载请注明文章来源)
热门推荐
Copyright © 2018-2022 第一范文网 版权所有 免责声明 | 联系我们
声明 :本网站尊重并保护知识产权,根据《信息网络传播权保护条例》,如果我们转载的作品侵犯了您的权利,请在一个月内通知我们,我们会及时删除。
客服QQ:xxxxxx 邮箱:xxxxxx@qq.com
渝ICP备2023013149号
Top